Legal Opinion
Myruski v. Town Board
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 14, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. O’Gorman, J.
Confronted with a history of expenditures which exhausted certain budgeted amounts approved for the Department of Highways in prior years, and having concluded that the Highway Department budget for the year 1976 was in some respects being prematurely exhausted, the defendant town board issued an order dated August 16, 1976 addressed to the employees of the Highway *1064Department advising them as follows: "Effective September 1, 1976, the Highway Department of the Town of Goshen will close for an undetermined period of time by Order of the Town Board.”
The board also adopted a resolution as shown…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gardner v. Town of CameronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Carlisle v. Burke, New York County Courts1913
- Hiscox v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Coggeshall v. HennesseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Flike v. StrobelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Albany Area Builders Ass'n v. Town of GuilderlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Murer v. ButterfieldNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1982
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1977