Hiscox v. Holmes
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCrapser, J.
On the 16th day of June, 1932, the town superintendent of highways presented to the supervisor two orders, bearing Nos. 42 and 43, respectively, directing the payment of forty-two dollars and fifty-two cents to John Fitzgerald and the sum of thirty-nine dollars and two cents to Frank H. Hiscox. Said orders were drawn against the miscellaneous fund, being moneys levied and collected for the removal of obstructions caused by snow and for other miscellaneous purposes. The orders were for cutting brush and grading park.
*241The supervisor had on hand in that fund a sum sufficient to pay the items of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People ex rel. Dare v. HowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- People Ex Rel. Dare v. . HowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hiscox v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Claim of Clarke v. Town of RussiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Myruski v. Town BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Cahn v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Maas v. DermodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.