Legal Opinion

Procter v. Tubb

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 11, 1915PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

William: Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

*677Plaintiff, E. W. Stanton, sued defendant, B. F. Procter, to recover the sum of $84.50 for eighty-four and one-half days’ work at $1.00 per day, and the sum of $96.66 for 161 bushels of corn at 60 cents per bushel, furnished to the defendant, and for the further sum of 55 cents advanced to the defendant to pay freight. Plaintiff admitted an indebtedness on his part of $58.38 for supplies furnished him by defendant, and asked judgment for $123.27. Defendant Procter filed an answer, cross-petition, and counterclaim, making one J.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hill v. Phillips' Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  2. Harmon v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  3. Fritts v. KirchdorferCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Lewis v. HeltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Blackburn v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Elkhorn Land & Improvement Co. v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Williams v. Denny, Banking CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Clark v. IsaacsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Bell v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Herndon v. BrawnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API