Legal Opinion

Bell v. Duncan

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 24, 1922PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Moorman

Reversing.

Appellant, W. M. Bell, sued the appellees and T. J and Mell Bauhard, in the Kenton circuit court, on two notes, of one thousand dollars each, dated December 22, 1914, and maturable February 1, 1916 and 1917, respectively, subject to a credit on each of the notes of five hundred dollars as of the date of execution. He alleged that T. J. and Mell Bauhard indorsed and delivered the notes to him for a valuable consideration, and he asked judgment against them and the appellees herein, makers of the notes, for the balance due, with interest until paid.

A…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morawick v. Martineck's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Gray v. GrimmCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Procter v. TubbCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Hunt v. NanceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  5. Knoxville Banking & Trust Co. v. MershonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. H. B. Jones Coal Company v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Bancokentucky Co. v. WeilCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  3. Coy v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. WisdomCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. First National Bank of Hazard v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API