Legal Opinion
Arnett v. Hayes Wheel Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1918No. Docket No. 34PublishedCited by 26 opinions
Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Mamie Arnett presented separate claims for compensation against the Hayes Wheel Company and the Grand Rapids Blow Pipe & Dust Arrester Company for the accidental death of her husband in defendants’ employ. From an order awarding compensation against the Hayes Wheel Company, it and the Michigan Workmen’s Compensation Mutual Insurance Company, insurer, bring, certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
The defendant Grand Rapids Blow Pipe & Dust Arrester Company, a manufacturing company of Grand Rapids, made a written offer to the Hayes Wheel Company of Jackson to install.in its factory an extension to its blow pipe and dust arrester, on 'the following terms:
“In regard to further changes and additions to your dust collecting system at above address, will say that we will furnish you with the following equipment. (Here follows an inventory of materials needed and price of same.) We will also furnish you with the necessary expert erecting mechanics to install the system at the rate of sixty…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Janik v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Spooner v. Detroit Saturday Night Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Opitz v. HoertzMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by26 opinions
- Renfroe v. Higgins Rack Coating & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Scribner's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Goodchild v. EricksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Independence Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. StapletonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.