Legal Opinion
Tepeyac v. Montgomery County
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 15, 2011No. Civil Action DKC 10-1259PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge.
Several motions are presently pending in this action under the First and Fourteenth Amendments: (1) a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment (ECF No. 5) filed by Defendants; (2) a motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 6) filed by Plaintiff; and (3) a motion to strike (ECF No. 19) filed by Defendants. A hearing was held and the parties have briefed the issues. For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion to strike will be denied, while their motion to dismiss will be denied in part and granted in part.…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Centro Tepeyac v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- International Refugee Assistance Project v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Booth v. County ExecutiveDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- Evergreen Ass'n v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.