Herz v. Hamilton
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.
— The respondent is one of the judges of the district court of the fourth judicial district. On or about July 12, 1923, proceedings were instituted before the respondent as a magistrate, for the purpose of determining whether or not the petitioner should be required to enter into security to keep the peace. The petitioner was brought before the respondent in said matter,'and a trial and hearing was had, and the petitioner was required to enter into a bond to keep the peace, as required by the statute.
I. Upon the hearing before the respondent, the petitioner, through his counsel, demanded the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In re StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
- McInerney v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Thelsen v. McDavidSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
- County of Black Hawk v. SpringerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- In re the Insanity of BreseeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TaubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Yost v. ScouszzioWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re WayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Commonwealth v. TaubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Porter v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1951