Legal Opinion

Davis v. Davis, Director

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1926No. 24,377PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, C. J.

Sustaining a demurrer to appellant’s complaint is the only error assigned. The demurrer was for the alleged reason “that said complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” • And if this court shall find that it does not state facts sufficient, and that the decision of the circuit court to that effect was correct, such decision must be approved, without regard to the sufficiency or insufficiency of the memorandum which was filed with the demurrer. Bruns v. Cope (1914), 182 Ind. 289, 296, 105 N. E. 471; Wagner v. Treesh (1919), 71 Ind. App. 551, 554, 125 N. E. 242.

T…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific RailwayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Bruns v. CopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Fowler Utilities Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Reynolds v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Wagner v. TreeshIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Eli Lilly & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Licocci v. Cardinal Associates, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Marksill Specialties, Inc. v. BargerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. SECO CHEMICALS, INC., ETC. v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Barnhart v. Western Maryland Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API