Hudson v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Lassing
Affirming.
Prior to June 28, 1907, William Hudson was.in the employ of the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Eailway Company, on its Chattanooga division, as an engineman. Upon that day he was discharged for an infraction of the rules of the company. On September 1, 1911, he brought suit against the company for $2,000, the alleged value of time lost by him during the period between the date of his discharge and December 1, 1908, charging that said sum was due him from the defendant because of its breach of a contract entered into by and between the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OffuttCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
- Burnetta v. Marceline Coal Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1904
- Byrd v. BeallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
3Cited by45 opinions
- Yazoo M.V.R. Co. v. SideboardMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
- Piercy v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Gatliff Coal Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Rentschler v. Missouri Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Yazoo & M. v. R. Co. v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.