Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 11, 1913PublishedCited by 45 opinions

Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Lassing

Affirming.

Prior to June 28, 1907, William Hudson was.in the employ of the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Eailway Company, on its Chattanooga division, as an engineman. Upon that day he was discharged for an infraction of the rules of the company. On September 1, 1911, he brought suit against the company for $2,000, the alleged value of time lost by him during the period between the date of his discharge and December 1, 1908, charging that said sum was due him from the defendant because of its breach of a contract entered into by and between the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OffuttCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  2. Burnetta v. Marceline Coal Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  3. Byrd v. BeallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Yazoo M.V.R. Co. v. SideboardMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Piercy v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Gatliff Coal Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  4. Rentschler v. Missouri Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Yazoo & M. v. R. Co. v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API