Legal Opinion

Atlantic Refining Co. v. Sheffield

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 17, 1926No. 5132PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. The workmen’s compensation act (Acts 1920, p. 167) in part is intended “to establish rates of compensation for personal injuries or death sustained by employees in the course of employment.” In subsection (d) of section 2 of the act it is declared that “‘Injury’ and ‘personal injury’ shall mean only injury by accident arising out of and in course of the employment.” Under this law, although an accident might arise in the course of the employment, the employee will not be entitled to compensation unless the injury arises “out of the employment.” Georgia Casualty Co. v. Martin, 157 Ga. 909,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mann v. Glastonbury Knitting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Georgia Casualty Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. FarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Wamhoff v. Wagner Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  3. Greeson v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  4. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. LemmingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Braselton v. BrazellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API