Legal Opinion

Braselton v. Brazell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 18, 1934No. 23815PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. The doctrine of the so-called “turntable cases,” -which constitutes an exception to the general rule that an occupier of land is under no duty to keep his premises safe for trespassers, but under which it has been held that a dangerous and attractive instrumentality such as a turntable must be kept on the land with ordinary care to protect children, who might reasonably be attracted thereby, will be strictly limited; and the doctrine will not be extended so as to have application to a motor-truck which is being driven by an agent of the owner on city streets or the premises of another.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fielder v. DavisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. BeaversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Greeson v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  4. Ferguson v. Columbus & Rome RailwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  5. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beard v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Hornsby v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. Reisch v. M & D TERMINALS, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. Cowart v. WidenerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Summers v. BarronCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API