Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Halsey
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The trial was upon count 5 and pleas in short by consent.
The errors assigned were for the refusal of general affirmative charges and the refusal of motion for a new trial.
Count 5 contained, among other necessary averments, “that said paralysis is the proximate result of said accident, and independently . of all other causes, and by violent and accidental means;’ * * * that his said disability was directly caused by said accident' independently of all other causes and was not caused either wholly or partly by any disease bodily or mental infirmity, or medical or surgical…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Marbury Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Jones v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Ala. Great Southern R. R. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Frazer v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- New York Life Insurance Company v. Juanita Stokes McGehee as of the Estate of William B. McGeheeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. McGheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Pollard v. TreadwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.