Legal Opinion

G. C. Murphy Co. v. Redevelopment Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1974No. Appeal, No. 31PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Pomeboy,

Appellants, who are owners and lessees of properties fronting on State Street in the City of Erie, brought this action against the City of Erie and the Erie Redevelopment Authority to enjoin the creation of a four block “Transitway Mall” on State Street between Sixth and Tenth Streets. The chancellor denied the requested relief, and the court en banc dismissed appellants’ exceptions to the decree nisi in a final decree. This appeal followed.1

By a resolution of February 12, 1965, the Erie City Council adopted a redevelopment proposal submitted by *221the Redevelopment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. West Homestead Borough School District v. Allegheny County Board of School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Schwab v. Pottstown BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. City of McKeesport v. McKeesport & Reynoldton Passenger Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Appeal From Passage of Ordinance 4354 of AltoonaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Hamilton Hills Group, LLC v. Hamilton Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Clearview Land Development Co. v. KassabCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Vartan v. REEDCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Knox v. Borough of Bridgewater, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API