Legal Opinion
State v. Jose S.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided September 18, 2007No. 24,988PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRY, Judge.
{1} Child-Defendant Jose S. appeals the trial court’s imposition of an adult sentence, alleging that the trial court’s procedural and substantive errors in conducting his amenability hearing require reversal. We consider the proper procedures that a trial court must follow in determining a youthful offender’s amenability to treatment and, in the event that a youthful offender is determined not to be amenable to treatment, the proper procedures for sentencing the youthful offender to adult sanctions under NMSA 1978, §§ 32A-2-17, -20 (2005). We reverse Child’s sentence based…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gunaji v. MacIasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. FernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. FernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. Sergio B.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- T-N-T Taxi, Ltd. v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Gonzales v. TafoyaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Ira v. JaneckaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. JOSE S.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.