Legal Opinion

Ira v. Janecka

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 2018No. S-1-SC-35657PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHÁVEZ, Justice.

{1} During the last thirteen years the Supreme Court of the United States, relying on neuroscientific evidence of adolescent behavior, issued three opinions declaring that certain sentences imposed on juvenile offenders violate the Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. Roper v. Simmons , 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d (2005) (prohibiting the imposition of the death penalty for a crime committed by a juvenile); Graham v. Florida , 560 U.S. 48 , 130 S.Ct. 2011 , 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010) (holding that no juvenile could be sentenced to life…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Carter, Bowie, McCullough v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. State v. SlocumbSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019
  3. State v. GulleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  4. State v. CatesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. OrtizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API