Legal Opinion

Prather v. Lentz

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1842PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Ciarle Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

BlacKEOüd, J.

Lentz, as assignee of the payee of a promissory note, brought an action of debt on the note against the makers, Prather and others. Pleas: 1st, That the note was executed by the defendants upon a usurious consideration; 2d, Payment to the payee before notice of the assignment; 3d, Pay*260ment to the plaintiff. Replications in denial of the pleas. The cause was submitted to the Court, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff.

Tile defendants, on the trial, offered as a witness the payee of the note, to prove the usurious consideration and the payments set out in the pleas. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Howell v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1831
  3. Bank of the Metropolis v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1834

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Horne v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Hanna v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1852

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API