Legal Opinion

Hanna v. Spencer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1852Published

ERROR to the Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Assumpsit by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error upon a promissory note for the payment of 93 dollars and 40 cents. Pleas: 1. Non assumpsit; 2. That the note was made upon the settlement of a certain cost-bill, which Hanna, as a marshal, claimed to be due him by Spencer, and that there was a mistake in said settlement, and nothing was, in fact, due; 3. Matters of set-off under the common counts.

The cause was submitted to a jury, who found a verdict for the defendant, and a motion for a new trial having been overruled, judgment was rendered accordingly.

Upon the trial Hugh…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Prather v. LentzIndiana Supreme Court · 1842

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API