Legal Opinion
Tuma v. Department of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 17, 1985No. C1-85-723PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Relator, Keith Turna, appeals from the Commissioner of Economic Security’s determination that he was not entitled to extended benefits pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 268.071 (1984). We affirm.
FACTS
Relator was discharged on February 9, 1984. On February 17, 1984 he applied for unemployment benefits. A base period was established from February 13, 1983 to *448February 11, 1984 — the first day of the week in which he filed his claim. During his base period, relator earned $1675 but received only $1521. He received his final paycheck on February 17, six days after the close of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chatfield v. HendersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Stawikowski v. Collins Electric Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- McCaleb v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Commissioner of Revenue v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Mrkonjich v. Erie Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986