Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Eric Tindal

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 9, 2020No. 20-0005Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 20–0005 Submitted September 16, 2020—Filed October 9, 2020 IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Appellee, vs. ERIC TINDAL, Appellant. On appeal from the report of the Iowa Supreme Court Grievance Commission. Grievance commission recommends suspension for violation of ethical rules. ATTORNEY REPRIMANDED. Waterman, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which Christensen, C.J., Appel, Mansfield, Oxley, and McDermott, JJ., joined. McDonald, J., filed a concurrence in part and dissent in part. Alexander E. Wonio of Hansen, McClintock & Riley, Des…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. Hernandez-LopezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. Amended September 30, 2015 Iowa Insurance Institute, Iowa Defense Counsel Association, Iowa Self-insurers' Association, Property Casualty Insurers Association of America, National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, and Iowa Association of Business and Industry v. Core Group of the Iowa Association for Justice Christopher J. Godfrey, Workers' Compensation Commissioner, Division of...Supreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard Scott RhinehartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. State of Iowa v. Marc A. HagenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  5. Johnston Equipment Corp. of Iowa v. Industrial IndemnitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API