Legal Opinion

Wolbarsht v. Donnelly

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 11, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.

The first of these actions has been previously considered by us. Wolbarsht v. Donnelly, 291 Mass. 229. The second action is brought to recover amounts alleged to be due under the same “roof lease” and to have accrued since the bringing of the first action. The death of the plaintiff Jacob L. Wolbarsht having been suggested (G. L. [Ter. Ed.] c. 228, § 4), his administratrix appeared and prosecuted the actions. The judge found for the plaintiff in both cases, and they now come before us on the defendant’s exceptions to the denial of certain of her requests for rulings.

The terms of the lease in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hebert v. DeweyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. Evans v. County of MiddlesexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Bellevue Hotel Co. v. Building CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Fechteler v. WhittemoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Wolbarsht v. DonnellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lane v. EpinardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Kanavos v. Hancock Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Danis v. Bridge Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Ikeoka v. KongHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Ikeoka v. KongHawaii Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API