Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ikeoka v. Kong

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1963No. 4269Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OE

LEWIS, J., WITH WHOM CASSIDY, J., JOINS.

To recover, the broker had to show that he had earned a commission in the manner specified by the terms of his employment, or that his client (hereinafter referred to as the “seller” or the “sellers”)1 had prevented him from fully performing by arbitrary action or other fault, without any fault on the part of the broker or the customer found by the broker (hereinafter referred to as the “buyer”). Walker v. Chancey, 96 Fla. 82, 117 So. 705; Livingston v. Malever, 103 Fla. 200, 137 So. 113; Dickey *238v. Waggoner, 108 Colo. 197, 114 P.2d…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Amies v. WesnofskeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Ormsby v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Pabst Brewing Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Livingston v. MaleverSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API