Legal Opinion

Terre Haute, Indianapolis & Eastern Traction Co. v. Ross

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1923No. 11,395PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

Action by appellee to recover from appellant the entire cost of renewing a certain highway crossing where the tracks of said companies cross each other in the city of Frankfort. The Indianapolis and Northwestern Traction Company and the Toledo, St. Louis and Western Railroad Company, of which the appellee is.receiver, entered into a contract in June, 1903, wherein the railroad company agreed that, in consideration of the promises and agreements therein made by the traction company, the latter might construct and operate its track across the track of the railroad company. This contract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. BarnhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Evansville & Southern Indiana Traction Co. v. Evansville Belt Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Union Traction Co. v. RossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Cincinnati, Lawrenceburg & Aurora Electric Street RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Vandalia Railroad v. Fort Wayne & Northern Indiana Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New Jersey, Indiana & Illinois Railroad v. New York Central RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Ross v. Terre Haute, Indianapolis & Eastern Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API