Legal Opinion

New Jersey, Indiana & Illinois Railroad v. New York Central Railroad

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1925No. 11,794PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDausman, C. J.

(after making the foregoing statement).

There is no contention that the entire contract is void. The only contention is that the provision of the contract which stipulates that the Iowa company shall make all needful repairs from time to time and that the cost thereof shall be paid by the New Jersey company is void on the ground that it is violative of the policy of the state as declared by statute. It is conceded that, in all other respects, the contract is valid and binding upon the parties to this appeal.

The proposal of the New Jersey company to construct its road across and upon the road…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. BarnhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Hogston v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Burley Tobacco Society v. GillaspyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Evansville & Southern Indiana Traction Co. v. Evansville Belt Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  2. Ross v. Terre Haute, Indianapolis & Eastern Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API