Legal Opinion

Hindman v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1964PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burnett

The plaintiffs in error, Hindman and Shropshire, were indicted under a two-connt indictment charging (1) burglary of a business house and (2) charging receiving and concealing stolen property. The jury, after pleas of not guilty had been filed, found both defendants guilty of burglary in the third degree and fixed the punishment at not less nor more than three (3) years in the penitentiary. From this conviction each defendant has seasonably appealed, able briefs have been filed by the counsel, representing the respective .parties, and arguments have been heard. After a very thorough…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ToliverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Young v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. LangfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. RalphTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Hobby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  5. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API