Legal Opinion

State v. Ralph

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1999PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, J.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the due process analysis delineated in State v. Anthony, 817 S.W.2d 299 (Tenn.1991) bars the defendant’s separate convictions for burglary and theft of the same automobile. The Court of Criminal Appeals, in a split decision, applied the due process analysis of Anthony and vacated the defendant’s burglary conviction on the ground that it was essentially incidental to the theft of the car. One judge dissented and argued that the analysis adopted in Anthony does not apply in the context of this case. For the reasons that follow, we agree…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Duchac v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. SteppanIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. AnthonyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Joey DeWayne ThompsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. JacksonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  3. State v. CowanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  4. State of Tennessee v. Larry Jereller Alston, Kris Theotis Young, and Joshua Edward WebbTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State of Tennessee v. George Andrew StanhopeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2013

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API