Jeffries v. Parker
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
When the granting clause in a deed to real property conveys an unqualified fee and the habendum contains no limitation on the fee thus conveyed and a fee simple title is warranted in the covenants of title, any additional clause or provision repugnant thereto and not by reference made a part thereof, inserted in the instrument as a part of, or following the description of the property conveyed, or elsewhere other than in the granting or habendum clause, which, tends to delimit the estate thus conveyed, will be deemed mere surplusage without force or effect. Artis v. Artis, 228 N.C. 754, 47…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Artis v. . ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Whitley v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Krites v. . PlottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Krites v. PlottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Jefferson v. . JeffersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Cleveland Realty Company v. HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- McCotter v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Oxendine v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Whetsell v. JerniganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.