Legal Opinion

Gulick v. HM Enoch, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 8, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

280 N.J. Super. 96 (1995)

654 A.2d 987

GEORGE V. GULICK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

H.M. ENOCH, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,

v.

THE PROCTOR COMPANY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT,

v.

THE SECOND INJURY FUND, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 25, 1995.

Decided March 8, 1995.

Before Judges SHEBELL, SKILLMAN and KLEINER.

Sheldon Schiffman argued the cause for respondent-appellant, H.M. Enoch, Inc. (Fred S. Brause, Jr., attorney; Mr. Schiffman, on the brief).

David N. Fiveland argued the cause for petitioner-respondent, George V. Gulick (Kirsch, Gelband & Stone,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Bucuk v. Edward A. Zusi Brass FoundryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Paul v. Baltimore Upholstering Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  4. Bond v. Rose Ribbon & Carbon Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  5. Lewicki v. New Jersey Art FoundrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Akef v. BASF Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Sexton v. County of CumberlandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  3. Williams v. Port AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  4. Levas v. Midway Sheet MetalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  5. Bird v. Somerset Hills Country ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API