Legal Opinion

Noel v. Norris

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided April 16, 2002No. 5:00CV00363 SWWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, Chief Judge.

Now before the Court is petitioner’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus [docket no. 30] and respondent’s response [docket no. 39]. Also before the Court is the motion of respondent to preclude petitioner from calling witnesses prior to compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [docket no. 38], petitioner’s responses [docket nos. 46 & 49], and respondent’s reply [docket no. 52],

Respondent contends that petitioner is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing or to call witnesses in support of his habeas corpus petition because his claims…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coleman v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  2. Jackson v. NorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2007
  3. Nowaczyk v. NHSPDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API