Legal Opinion
Delude v. Town of Amherst
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 2, 1993No. 92-059PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The plaintiffs, Paul and Shirley Delude, filed a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that the provisions of the zoning ordinance of the Town of Amherst pertaining to mobile homes violate RSA 674:32 (Supp. 1992) and the State Constitution. The Superior Court (Goode, J.) dismissed the petition. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The plaintiffs informally presented a proposal to build a manufactured housing park to the town planning board. Having concluded with “absolute certainty that any [formal] application for approval could not be granted” by the town, the plaintiffs made…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vlahos Realty Co. v. Little Boar's Head DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1958
- Town of Nottingham v. HarveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Blue Jay Realty Trust v. City of FranklinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. KennettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
- Silver Brothers, Inc. v. WallinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bill Duncan & a. v. State of New Hampshire & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Sirrell v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Binda v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- In re MoneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- Sirrell v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001