Peabody Holding Co. v. United Mine Workers International Union
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEONIE M. BRINKEMA, District Judge.
Before the Court are plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs’ Motion will be denied, as will defendant’s Motion to Dismiss; however, defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
Only a brief recitation of the facts is required in this opinion, as they have already been extensively discussed in two previous opinions. See generally Peabody Holding Co., LLC v. United Mine Works of Am., No. I:09cv1043,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peabody Holding Company v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Surf City Steel, Inc. v. International Longshore & Warehouse UnionDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015