Surf City Steel, Inc. v. International Longshore & Warehouse Union
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS [48]
BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL; District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION.
Pending before the .Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 48.) After consideration of the papers "filed in support of and in opposition to, the instant, motion, the Court deems this matter appropriate for decision ■ without *1224oral argument of counsel. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
II. BACKGROUND
A.The Parties
P…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- (PC) Smithee v. California Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020