Legal Opinion
DARTMOOR CONDOMINIUM ASS'N, INC. v. Guarco
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 16, 2008No. AC 29011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
In this case, we are called on to determine whether a rule of practice requiring a “review of the finding of facts and hearing on any objections” to a fact finder’s report requires that the trial court listen to the arguments of counsel. We conclude that it does. Following the rule of construction that specific provisions prevail over more general provisions, we conclude that a hearing was required even where oral argument was not requested specifically by the objecting party.
The defendant Michael B. Guarco 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cogan v. Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Pitchell v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. State Employees' Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Zirinsky v. ZirinskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Banks Building Co. v. Malanga Family Real Estate Holding, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. OutingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Snowdon v. GrilloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. OutingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010