Legal Opinion

Billings v. Shrewsbury

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1982No. 15213PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEELY, Justice:

The appellants, Lourine Shrewsbury and Earl and Dorothy Trigg, appeal from a final judgment of the Circuit Court of Mercer County, holding that they violated a restrictive covenant prohibiting the placing of mobile homes in a residential subdivision. The appellants contend on appeal that their homes are not mobile homes within the meaning of the restrictive covenant. We agree with regard to the Shrewsbury home, but disagree with regard to the Trigg home.

In 1968, Mr. and Mrs. Ralph Kiblinger began selling lots on property now known as Green Acres Subdivision. In 1976, they…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heath v. ParkerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Brownfield Subdivision, Inc. v. McKeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Kyritsis v. FennyNew York Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carr v. Michael Motors, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Albert v. OrwigeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  3. Kennedy v. Classic Designs, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. Heape v. BroxtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Albert v. OrwigeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API