Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Heath v. Parker

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1980No. 12331PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASLEY, Justice.

Harry and Fern Heath and eleven other subdivision lot owners (Heath) sued Ross and Anne Parker (Parker) to enforce a restrictive covenant against placing a “trailer” in the subdivision, claiming that Parker’s double-wide mobile home fits that definition. The trial judge found for Heath. We reverse.

The sole issue is whether Parker’s mobile home is a trailer under the circumstances here. The material facts are not in dispute. Parker purchased two lots in the Deming Ranchettes subdivision in 1975 and 1977. He bought a double-wide mobile home and moved it on the lots. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hannula v. Hacienda Homes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Montoya v. BarrerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Grossman v. HatleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  4. Hoover v. WaggomanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Hussey v. RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Robinson Township v. KnollMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Wilcox v. Timberon Protective AssociationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Your Home, Inc. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. Kinchen v. LaytonMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  5. White v. LegodaisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API