Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Miners & Merchants Bank, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1981No. 13268PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Chief Justice.

Appellant sought damages from appellee for breach of a purchase agreement. In its amended answer and counterclaim, appellee asked that the agreement be rescinded because consent to the agreement was based on a mistake of fact. The trial court found for appellee and entered judgment rescinding the purchase agreement. We reverse and remand.

Appellee is a banking corporation with its principal place of business at Lead, South Dakota. On August 5, 1976, appellee entered into a written agreement to sell to one Dennis P. Casey the old City Hall building in Rapid City for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beatty v. DepueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Nilsson v. KruegerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Eggers v. EggersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Max Rochholz v. Frank L. Farrar and Robert R. KrugerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. Samuel Horsford v. Gilbert RomeoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. LPN Trust v. Farrar Outdoor Advertising, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Knudsen v. JensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Nelson v. Gregory CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Lucero v. Van WieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Wolken v. WadeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API