Legal Opinion

Boudinot v. Hamann

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 15, 1902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Scott District Oourt. — Hon. J. W. Bollinger, Judge. Action in equity by a trustee in bankruptcy, under the federal statute, to set aside certain conveyances made by a bankrupt to defendant. There was a decree for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the Court

Waterman, J. —

There is no special dispute as to-the facts. The principal contention of the parties arises over inferences drawn from the facts. The firm of H. Oars-tens & Son were the owners of a stock of merchandise in the city of Davenport. On November 2, 1896, they made a mortgage thereon to Beals, Torrey & Oo., creditors, who later assigned said security to S. W. Pierce. In the months of March and June of the year 1899, H. Oars-tens & Son borrowed of a bank the aggregate sum of $1,450, giving their notes as security therefor. The defendant, John F. Hamann, signed these notes, apparently…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grant v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Stucky v. Masonic Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. In re EggertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
  4. Barbour v. PriestSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Crawford v. NolanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Deland v. Miller & Cheney BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Des Moines Savings Bank v. Morgan Jewelry Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Burnham v. Fort Dodge Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Stark v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Capital National Bank v. WilkersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API