Marriage of Schaplow

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . iii STATEMENT OF ISSUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 STATEMENT OF CASE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 STATEMENT OF FACTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ARGUMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 I. THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED BY MODIFYING CUSTODY OF THE PARTIES' CHILDREN WHEN THERE WAS NO MOTION FOR MODIFICATION BEFORE THE COURT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 II. THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED BY APPLYING THE "BEST INTERESTS" TEST WITHOUT MAKING THE REQUISITE…