Legal Opinion
Bumpers v. International Mill Services, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 17, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-1219PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES McGIRR KELLY, District Judge.
Defendant’s moved to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), (2) and (6). Defendants alleged that this court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter and over the parties; and the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The plaintiff, Jay C. Bumpers, was employed by defendant Clarence A. Hackett, Inc. (“Hackett”), a New York corporation with its principal place of business in Philadelphia, since December 1954. In 1981, Hackett was acquired…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Glus v. G. C. Murphy Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sandom v. Travelers Mortgage Services, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Borecki v. Eastern International Management Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Harris v. WGN Continental Broadcasting Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Marcoz v. Summa Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Beckwith v. International Mill Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.