AID Insurance Co. (Mutual) v. Continental Western Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether the Minnesota No-Fault Reparations Act obligates an insurer licensed to do business in this state to provide basic economic loss benefits to its insured injured in a Minnesota accident, even though its insured is a nonresident and has no vehicles in Minnesota at the time of the accident, at priority level 4(a) of Minn.Stat. § 65B.47 (1984). The trial court in granting summary judgment held that it was. The Court of Appeals affirmed.1 We reverse.
The parties conceded there existed no genuine issues of material fact and submitted the issue to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Aid Insurance Co. v. Continental Western Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Great West Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000