Legal Opinion

Wicks v. Southern Pacific Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 6, 1956No. Nos. 14483, 14484PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BONE, Circuit Judge.

By stipulation of the parties these two cases arising in California where appellants reside1 were consolidated on this appeal since they involve the same issues arising out of ultimate facts similar in nature. The facts are not in dispute.

Each appellant has long been an employee of one of the appellee railroads here involved, Wicks since 1914, Jensen sixice 1917; each has been continuously so employed except for a short time during the First World War; each is presently able, ready and willing to continue his service; the railroads are willing to continue that employment;…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Merle D. Vincent, Jr., Regional Director of the Third Region of the National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. Family Division Trial Lawyers of the Superior court-d.c., Inc. v. H. Carl Moultrie, Chief Judge, D.C. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Condor Operating Co. v. SawhillTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Flood v. KuhnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  5. 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 247, 1 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9647 George C. Wicks, and v. Southern Pacific Co. (Pacific Lines), and Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, Intervenor and Philip F. Jensen, and v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., a Corporation, and Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees, Intervenor AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API