Legal Opinion
O & P Realty v. Santana
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 10, 1989No. 6310PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff landlord in a summary process action based on the nonpayment of rent. The defendant tenant claims that the trial court erred in holding that a disclaimer by the plaintiff, contained in the notice to quit, prevented the creation of a new tenancy. We find no error.
The facts are undisputed. The plaintiff and the defendant entered into an oral month-to-month lease with rent payments due on the first day of each month. On May 12, 1987, the defendant was served with a notice to quit that contained the following statement: “NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Prevedini v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- County Fire Door Corp. v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Southland Corp. v. VernonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Costello v. Hartford Institute of Accounting, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- New England Whalers Hockey Club v. NairConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- 914 North Colony, LLC v. 99 West, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- Decsepel v. Cassin, No. Cv91 0117586 (Apr. 21, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Gerrity Company, Inc. v. Spencor Construction, No. 332298 (Aug. 5, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
- Harved Realty v. Leekoff, No. Sph 94367 (Nov. 24, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- L I, Inc. v. D S, Inc., No. 297890 (Jul. 19, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.