Legal Opinion

Exchange Bank v. Scholz

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1942No. Civ. 11839PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment foreclosing a mortgage made to secure a promissory note and providing for a deficiency judgment against the maker of the note, defendant Rudolph J. Scholz.

The note in the principal sum of $6,000 and the mortgage were executed by defendant Rudolph J. Scholz in favor of defendant Edward P. Sophey on November 3, 1927. The note by its terms was payable two years after date.

The defendants Sophey, who were engaged in business as co-partners, on December 30, 1927, entered into an arrangement for the benefit of their creditors whereby they agreed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adolph Ramish, Inc. v. WoodruffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Fernandez v. TormeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Ross v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Security-First National Bank v. Spring Street Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eastern Acceptance Corp. v. KavlickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  2. Rechnitzer v. Boyd (In Re Executive Growth Investments, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API