Legal Opinion
Ross v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1934No. Docket No. 1403PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
Plaintiff instituted this action on July 19, 1928, seeking cancellation of a certain promissory note executed by him in the amount of $1250 and a trust deed covering real property in Biverside County which was given to secure payment of the note. Both instruments were dated April 18, 1928. The note was made payable one year after date. The payee named in the note was Charles H. Weygint. The grounds alleged in the complaint for cancellation were entire lack of consideration and fraud on the part of the payee. The original complaint named no defendant other than the payee, Charles H. Weygint.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- County of Warren v. MarcySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Holbrook v. . New Jersey Zinc Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Thorp v. MindemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- MacDermot v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Mayes v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Haulman v. CrumalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Walsh v. Alpha Financial Group (In Re Rice)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Exchange Bank v. ScholzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Nuckolls v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937