Legal Opinion

In re A.R.M.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 30, 2000No. C4-99-1553PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge

The 1990 judgment dissolving the marriage of appellant-mother Mary Mertz and respondent-father Robert Mahowald awarded mother sole physical custody of the parties’ child. In February 1997, mother voluntarily placed the child in foster care. Thereafter, in June, the child was adjudicated in need of protection or services (CHIPS). Later, efforts by father to obtain custody of the child under chapter 518 and efforts by the county to place the child with father in the CHIPS proceeding were unsuccessful. In Aug. 1999, however, the county’s third attempt to place the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Auge v. AugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Balder v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. McIntire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API