Legal Opinion

Corso v. Maroney

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1968PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.

Third-party defendant moves to renew and reargue its prior motion to dismiss the third-party summons and complaint on the ground it fails to state a cause of action. Since no additional facts are alleged, the application shall be deemed a motion for reargument only and, as such, is granted. But upon reconsideration and after carefully reviewing the pleadings, as well as the cases and principles of law referred to by movant, the court is constrained to adhere to its original decision, denying the motion to dismiss.

Movant contends that if the third-party plaintiff had no knowledge of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Higgins v. MasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Lipsman v. WarrenNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Weisman v. HyamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Franklin v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API