Legal Opinion

Lipsman v. Warren

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacob J. Schwartzwald, J.

The third-party defendant herein moves to dismiss the third-party complaint and cross claim over on the ground that they fail to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action or, in the alternative, for summary judgment based upon a notice to admit. The third-party plaintiffs cross-move for leave to extend their time to admit or deny the items in the notice to admit served upon them.

Plaintiffs sued defendants, who are also the third-party plaintiffs, to recover damages for injuries sustained while they were passengers in the defendant Warren’s automobile while it was being operated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fox v. Western New York Motor Lines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Higgins v. MasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Schaeffer v. CaldwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. Cloud v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
  5. Middleton v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Franklin v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Allied Mutual Casualty Corporation v. General Motors Corporation and Tom Parker D/B/A Parker Buick CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. Shulman v. Chrysler Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  4. Corso v. MaroneyNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Lipsman v. WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API