Legal Opinion

Nebraskans Against Expanded Gambling, Inc. v. Nebraska Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2000No. S-98-828PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

The appellants, Nebraskans Against Expanded Gambling, Inc. (NAEG), and Brian Fontana, brought the instant action against the Nebraska Horsemen’s Benevolent & Protective Association (NHBPA) and the commissioners of the Nebraska State Racing Commission (collectively the appellees). The NHBPA had received licenses from the commission to conduct simulcast horseracing. The appellants sought a declaratory judgment that any simulcast racing events conducted by NHBPA were contrary to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-1204 (Reissue 1991), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 2-1207 and 2-1228 (Reissue 1997), and Neb. Const, art.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Community First State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Ritchhart v. DaubNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Rexroad, Inc. v. Sanitary & Improvement District No. 66Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Cross v. PerretenNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Billups Ex Rel. Billups v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Chambers v. LautenbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In re Claims Against Pierce ElevatorNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State Ex Rel. Steinke v. LautenbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Governor's Policy Research Office v. KN EnergyNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Prokop v. HochNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API