Nebraskans Against Expanded Gambling, Inc. v. Nebraska Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.
The appellants, Nebraskans Against Expanded Gambling, Inc. (NAEG), and Brian Fontana, brought the instant action against the Nebraska Horsemen’s Benevolent & Protective Association (NHBPA) and the commissioners of the Nebraska State Racing Commission (collectively the appellees). The NHBPA had received licenses from the commission to conduct simulcast horseracing. The appellants sought a declaratory judgment that any simulcast racing events conducted by NHBPA were contrary to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-1204 (Reissue 1991), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 2-1207 and 2-1228 (Reissue 1997), and Neb. Const, art.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gordon v. Community First State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Ritchhart v. DaubNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Rexroad, Inc. v. Sanitary & Improvement District No. 66Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
- Cross v. PerretenNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Billups Ex Rel. Billups v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chambers v. LautenbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- In re Claims Against Pierce ElevatorNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Steinke v. LautenbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Governor's Policy Research Office v. KN EnergyNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Prokop v. HochNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.