Legal Opinion

Ritchhart v. Daub

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1999No. S-98-224PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

INTRODUCTION

The appellants, Hal Daub, Thomas Graeve, and Mark Conrey, were, respectively, the mayor, the fire chief, and the communications chief for the city of Omaha (collectively the defendants). They appeal from a judgment of the district court purporting to void certain oral agreements that Daub had made with Graeve and Conrey. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the appellee^ Kimberly Ritchhart, did not have standing to prosecute this action. Accordingly, the district court did not have jurisdiction to consider the issues presented, and we reverse the district court’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Costopoulos v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Blondheim v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Akau v. Olohana Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Chambers v. LautenbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re Interest of Natasha H.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Rath v. City of SuttonNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In re Claims Against Pierce ElevatorNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State Ex Rel. Steinke v. LautenbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API