Legal Opinion

Prokop v. Hoch

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 2000No. S-97-1104PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

Unlike fine wine, most lengthy and acrimonious lawsuits do not age well. This dispute between Robert J. Prokop and Nancy Hoch is no exception. Prokop seeks recovery from Hoch, Richard Hoch, and the law firm of Hoch & Steinheider (hereinafter collectively the appellees) for libel or slander, malicious prosecution, and for filing a frivolous pleading. The appellees demurred to Prokop’s fourth amended petition on the bases that any causes of action arising from a previous lawsuit filed by Hoch against Prokop were barred by the statute of limitations and that the remainder of Prokop’s petition…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gordon v. Community First State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hoch v. ProkopNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. LaPan v. MyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Professional Business Services Co. v. RosnoNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Federal, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Holmes v. Crossroads Joint VentureNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Iwanski v. GomesNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Drake v. DrakeNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API