Legal Opinion
Amp Incorporated v. Vaco Products Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 12, 1960No. 12835_1PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Circuit Judge.
The complaint charges infringement of Wenger Patent No. 2,560,318 on a device for cutting bolts and screws. The District Court, by judgment, dismissed the suit declaring the patent invalid on the ground of obviousness, and also dismissed the charge of unfair competition. This appeal is from that part of the judgment dismissing the patent infringement count and declaring the patent to be invalid.
The patent in suit was issued on July 10, 1951, on application of Frank J. Wenger, filed July 6, 1948. Plaintiff became the owner of the patent by assignment. The patent relates to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. Wilson & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Hunt v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Charles Peckat Mfg. Co. v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Milgo Electronic Corporation, a Florida Corporation v. United Business Communications, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- T. P. Laboratories, Inc. v. Gerald W. HugeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Mott Corporation and C. W. Mott Research Engineers v. Sunflower Industries, Inc. And Owen Murrell CrumpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Continental Can CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
- Ekstrom-Carlson & Co. v. Onsrud MacHine Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.